>Criticizing gow proper based off your gameplay
What………….. the only gow proper game I ever critiqued was 3, and even then am I really wrong? I have been critiquing it for a huge while, even before that, heck even talked with it with GMG on his YouTube channel.
>Rpg elements
The reason I brought it up was because it’s one of the female’s BIGGEST issues. And not enough people talk about it I feel like, which is why I brought that up(also, why do you still think that tiwtter thread I made was based off of you?!?!?!?!?!???? Because I quoted you? You do know people have been saying that shit since forever right?!?!?!???!??!?!?!!??!? Aka gow 4. I guess had some of your thoughts in mind, but I really only recall talking about the rpg mechanics and such, not much else). And back to rpg elements, one thing the developers talk about a lot was enemy hit reactions, which goes out the fucking window when a enemy is even one level ahead of you, and I feel like people saying”me don’t like rpg elements!” Don’t go that much deeper about it, which imo makes the developers just ignore it. Since it comes across as it not being what they want per se which gives them the impression that they can keep on doing that instead of taking advice of how to improve it(raeng came up with a genius way to implement it actually, I even talked about it without referencing him).
>every enemy
???????? How so? Only other enemy I talked about was beast lord I think, and I even said(multiple times btw) that they are FANTASTIC enemy types. Even defended them against some vets. Also, don’t act like I don’t critique raggy enemy’s at all. Heck, I’d say I do that more than gow proper enemy’s. I literally call an entire enemy faction pointless, which is something I don’t do at all with gow proper. And even then, are my critiques not valid? Being able to OS spam a beast lord to death ain’t something that should be atleast a bit addressed? It makes them a total joke, and heck even bigvee critiques that aspect of them alot, yet now I’m in the wrong and am just hating for the sake of it? I even praised the Minotaur in 3 btw. Sure, I think he could be better, and give suggestions for it but when has that ever been a bad thing? I do it for raggy with many enemy’s yet when I talk about 3 I cross the line?!?!?!? I guess infinete OS gow 1 enemy’s in air? But again, I even say for some enemy’s in gow 1 I don’t think it’s too bad(gorgons and such due to their ability to use petrification to kill you instantly). Like really, should the HEAVIEST Minotaur variant, be exploitable to air OS spam? It’s not the worst thing in the world(due to other options that grant different rewards such as petrification, again). Also, I never claimed I was the only one who “knew” raggy. When I said that, I was talking casuals and not you, heck you know a good chunk of raggy tech, and I’m not sure if I’d call myself the best player in the world like…. At all haha. There is 7 billion people ain’t there? Also, I beat all of the games in VH, multiple times btw, even started a gow 2 NUR+ at my apartment(couldn’t Finnish due to traveling). If I were to critique the games based on what challenge runners do, I would critique boundary exploits, gow ascension Plume spam, being able to OS spam sirens in gow 3, etc. I would be pulling a willy on everyone(also, how am I willy? I only made that comment as a joke in the GoS stream, and even then if I were it would be obviously a troll account). Also, I never said wraiths sucked, I thought they were fine but thought OS spam was far too powerful and a easy way to get rid of them. As well as feeling one more in certain areas like using CH to get them out of barrel which while not bad, could be a lot more interesting if there was another equally effective option(imagine if we could send them on fire, and when burrowing they set other enemy’s on fire that they are next to on fire also, and make a unique decision that being, should I go the safe route and use CG, or use a risky yet high rewarding inferno shot, of course I think it would take a bit to make it better, but imagine if it’s fine right?!?!?!!?). Also, I praise gow 3 a lot, I even said on twitter it has arguably the best encounters in the series. There are a lot of great ones. And again, 3 also has some great enemy’s I think(the dogs, Minotaurs armored, the golden dudes who grew on me,etc). It’s a good enemy roster I think. Sure, I was a bit too critical on it, but that was my feelings then, I just think 3 could be a lot better. Although reading it back now I definitely see what you mean, if I could go back in time I would definitely word it a very differently. But we all make mistakes, and we grow from it. Although reading it again, I defiantly was wayyyy too harsh in it. And am pretty ashamed of myself for it now. In general, I don’t want this to become a argument, and I just want things like that to be left behind for good. Since I am very ashamed of it as well. I hope you can understand.