I can understand him being upset about 0 views for the effort he puts in
I remember Saur had similar feelings. Not about gaining views, but just how you work hard to put out quality content and it just gets shut down by trolls and these know nothing journalists.He once didn't care for a comment I made on his Twitter, told his viewers to torch me for fun,
That's because he's full of shit and while he sounds reasonable in his vids he states his opinions as fact and turns nasty when opposed and proven wrong. Most of these youtubers are like cult leaders and their followers are nuts. Did he know or have anything to say about those death threats? You should expose his sorry ass.I sometimes feel it can be a bit of a Ninja Gaiden wank-fest, but I try to keep it informative and open-minded.
Yeah but you don't claim it's the best ever or make shit up. I'm obviously not trying to pick a fight with anybody here. Just a bit taken aback by the point-blank negativity.
Years of arguing on Gamefaqs and others has made us bitter old men. Being attacked for discussing mechanics and proving people wrong with facts because they have some weird troll agenda that a game of their choosing MUST remain bad at all costs. Look at my somewhat recent adventures on the DMCV board regarding Chaos Legion, how butthurt people get when you tell them something they don't know, because in their own minds they had established that they knew it all.
Here's a fantastic example on Knack 2 I came across recently. Go to 5:18.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkElGsk-5ZA
>Claims it's better than Knack 1, but that's like comparing shit with shit.
Why? No real reasons. No mechanical knowledge presented.
>Claims we know are not the best platformers in the world.
If only you did.
Speaking for the second game, a lot of the platforming is pretty interesting requiring you to change size a lot.
>Dont want to play into the meme
Then plays into it. Says it's the perfect time to make fun of it.
>Asks why would they make a sequel after the first horrible game?
Why make DMC3 after DMC2?
>Wanted to prove they could make a better version
The fuck else would you try a sequel for???
>Made it a little better
Yet can't explain how or why it's only a little better (refer to tactical forum, and see this thing called evidence and mechanical knowledge).
>No one interested 'for a reason'. Cites boring characters, everything about it being lame.
Subjective/no knowledge of mechanics.
This is the kind of attitude I'm talking about and have lost count of these morons who post their lack of knowledge as fact.