>impossible
For the average person with a normal lawyer, yes. Of course, if you were 'somebody' you wouldn't be getting forced to begin with.
>unlimited power
Doesn't sound representative, does it? Like that all over. Just brazen with this matter (and getting worse all the time).
>take gov to court
Doable in the states up to a point. Points like you getting assassinated among other punishments. The former is more for trying to make a move against the elite desire to bed kids. Don't even think of coming between them and their supply of children to massacre if you value your life.
>not in the health sector
What is there that isn't being muscled into place? Construction? Organized Crime? Jests aside, not a lot comes to mind. A topic of research all by itself. My eldest sister just bends the knee and chooses to believe (at the expense of her children *doomed like all the pets she killed up to this point*). I'll be sure to hold it against her should something happen to the eldest in particular. Another sibling went into the field, but isn't disclosing his status. Almost a certainty he went along with what the corporation would want. My god parents retired and were business owners, so this isn't their direct concern. As for their children, however...I'm unsure if my best friend (military contracts) will be able to duck it while doing that work or not. I (like him) don't especially care about his sisters, but both of them are ass out on this matter. My eldest aunt will be dead owed to some odd condition within a few more years. Her time enduring the travesty that is working with fellow VA nurses is over, so she was spared all this. Still made the mistake of believing them without looking into it. I've not been fortunate enough for the virus, pill, jab, etc. to kill my father just yet. These cunts can't do anything right by me, it seems.
>isn't mRNA
If that is so and it is at least posing as a proper vax (containing the virus and offering immunity), that would be swell. As before, I haven't looked deeply into that one.
>feel safe about it
Safer, anyway. Issues existed even in the real thing (that weren't completely experimental using live people in the trial period).
>seem fine
How nice for them. For now. It isn't one shot. Not even two. It is indefinite. No end to re-ups. Just piling on chances while rolling the dice repeatedly (boosters and more pills in the works).
>paranoid
Not always a bad thing (not like you're given a reason to trust the situation what with being pressured into it). Powerful people (including Pfizer's CEO) won't get it and are protecting themselves from being forced? Curious. Enormous profits? Certainly no motivation to keep that going (and growing). Protected from their shit being terrible? Seems legit (to be fair, in the US, this was done for regular vax, too *under Reagan*). FDA top dog joins Pfizer as they get approval. Neat. NIH does their testing. Ran by Fauci's wife. Fauci who used to run them (and is invested in one of the pills and helped make this problem *his emails were fun to read*). No need to drone on about Pfizer at all, really (not their past nor their present). Preaching to the choir. Really, I can say the same for all the alternatives (ignoring Nova for a moment). Still have a year plus for 'trials' to finish.
At present, I'm not given the impression NovaVax offers sterilizing immunity (which means that it is also not a vaccine, but at least it shouldn't cause the same sorts of nonsense via the mRNA antics or the crap JJ pulls). At best it isn't going to fuck you up (while creating variants through you). That would be a 'win' given our situation. Low bar, but if it just makes more Rona while otherwise not jacking you up, swell. Roner ain't exactly the problem to deal with. Just that if it isn't giving immunity, then it is just suppressing symptoms should they arise (one would hope you're not getting sabotaged in silence as such with some of the funnier things attributed to SARS2.0). Should it even be held against them for failing to be a 'vax' when the 'flu' (fellow of the same family) continues to make a mockery of this approach to begin with? I wouldn't even care without all the ridiculous measures in response to their baby.
I'd like to think it won't be among those that trigger ADE (among other problems). You're not a pregnant woman, so you won't have to fret over this spike protein business (can't speak for your heart so much) with how it relates to your non-existent placenta, so that's a relief. Issues relating to spike proteins all over the place aside, there is this business with seemingly having gp120 (something of a problem by itself *don't fancy the sound of "HIV dementia"*). When asked, essentially the response is 'we will get back to you about that'. Really, the best bet in a case like yours should you lack a means to duck it completely would be that which you resign yourself to while taking counter-measures about probable issues resulting from it. One should hope that suffices with this gift from Bill (who wants to get the world's population way down via viruses in his own words, which is a curious thing to say). I'm guessing acquiring IVM is out of the question even forms marketed for animals. That how it is in your neck of the woods?
NOTE: NZ got internment camps like AU? Never bothered to check. US is still working on theirs.